🔗 Share this article

A veteran Pentagon reporter recalls many occasions throughout their years reporting on the defense establishment when the real story differed significantly from the official version.

Following the fall of Baghdad in 2003, the then head of the Pentagon was publicly ecstatic, insisting it signaled the success of the military campaign. However, through informal conversations with military officers, the reporter soon discovered a more complex reality: more forces were needed to secure supply lines being targeted by supporters of the former regime.

“Did I as a reporter solicit information?” the reporter wrote. “Naturally. It’s called journalism. Finding out what’s really going on away from public view and not accepting completely official statements claims.”

This reporter is among numerous Pentagon reporters confronting the loss of their credentials after declining to agree to a controversial directive from the defense chief. The requirement would force reporters to sign an agreement stating they will publish only information “officially approved” by the defense department.

Shift from Watchdogs to Government Agents

Signing such an agreement would essentially transform reporters “from watchdogs into state functionaries”, as noted by a previous head of a prominent press association and ex- senior editor of a international wire service.

This journalist is in good company. Media outlets such as major newspapers, wire services, and online platforms – including some with right-leaning viewership – are rejecting the ultimatum.

Unsurprisingly, a network known as a state-friendly broadcaster has agreed to sign.

Television Outlets Join the Protest

In a major move, the leading TV networks – even those considered friendly to the government – issued a joint statement stating their rejection.

“The policy is unprecedented and threatens fundamental press freedoms,” they announced. “We will persist to cover the armed forces as we has done for generations, upholding the values of a independent media.”

This near-unanimous position is correct – and it is heartening to see such unity. This kind of journalistic cohesion is powerful – and society could use more of it, especially when journalists are often targeted.

Reporting vs. Transcription

No matter how much the Pentagon leadership might desire it, reporting is not stenography, and the officially approved narrative is frequently only a beginning for deeper reporting that uncovers the facts.

The directive has been described as a “war on truth” that clearly threatens the purpose of free press guarantees and erodes the public’s right to know what their government is undertaking.

The defense chief's reaction to this near-universal rejection was marked by a juvenile use of digital icons on online platforms, waving goodbye outlets that declined to comply.

Escalation of Media Controls

This newest action represents an increase in controls. Not only does the Pentagon rarely hold media availabilities now, but earlier it also prohibited reporters from the majority of the building without an official escort. This departure from historical precedent hindered the capacity of reporters to collect nuanced information through everyday contacts.

Under the revised rules, reporters could be designated a threat simply for asking defense personnel for confidential information.

Determination of Journalistic Mission

It is clear that journalists and their organizations will persist to report on the operations of the military, informing the citizens about their government's actions.

Credentials is not everything. In fact, the journalistic quest for access to powerful people and institutions – and the desire to protect that access – may hinder truthful journalism.

As a previous reporter observed, the press can continue performing their duties through methods other than relaying government-sanctioned information to the audience.

“Reporting of the military can be pursued through unauthorized disclosures, public records requests, and other cooperative methods harnessing the legal system’s protections,” the journalist stated. And they can continue to do so, they added, “till this benighted regime reaches its conclusion.”